SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sully- who wrote (41767)11/23/2005 8:39:15 PM
From: Peter Dierks  Respond to of 90947
 
Thanks. There on many on the left who see no bias in the media except for Fox News. They point at Fox and conservative talk radio as examples of what is wrong with the media. They choose to see the reaction to the liberal bias as the problem rather than judging liberal bias to be the problem.

A huge difference is that conservatives and moderates to not begrudge liberals their right to their bias, in the last couple decades conservatives have done what they always do, react. That is why they are called reactionaries.

There is so much proof out there that the FMSM is far left, but because the FMSM refuse to report on their disconnection from reality, liberals are able claim that the only published research comes from non liberal sources. Since in the liberals mind there is no life outside of liberalism, the research does not really exist.



To: Sully- who wrote (41767)11/24/2005 11:11:36 AM
From: Solon  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
"It's clear he didn't see any liberal bias in that
story.
"

There may have been Liberal bias if the reporter was a Liberal. My point was that sensationalism is the nuts and bolts for many newspapers. It was sufficient for me to recognise that it was contrived sensationalism. I had no need to target a political persuasion.