Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (41870)	11/29/2005 12:19:44 AM
From: Sully-	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

"The "Coalition of the Willing" had and has NO LEGAL STANDING." I'm so nonplussed with your baseless personal opinion. The Gulf War Cease Fire Agreement - AKA - UN Resolution # 687 & UN Resolution # 1441 were the legitimate legal documents necessary for the removal of Saddam. I suggest you read them sometime without applying your extreme liberal bias. dalebroux.com un.int As for the rest of your rant, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. I'm fµ¢£în¶ sick of tired old discredited DNC Talking Points being regurgitated for the ten thousandth time. And your childish personal attacks are as pointless & lame as your talking points. What I want to know is why you folks insist on being so relentlessly dishonest? It's blatantly transparent.

To: Solon who wrote (41870)	11/29/2005 1:56:40 AM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

So your opinion is that SH should have been allowed to continue his genocide? Message 21926059

To: Solon who wrote (41870)	11/29/2005 7:54:00 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 90947

The "Coalition of the Willing" had and has NO LEGAL STANDING. Nor has the Coalition of the Bribed. In fact, less so. By far. I see. So Britain is the Holy Grail when you wisj it to be; otherwise it is a US stooge. Australia, as a former British colony and a memeber of the Commonwealth, has a standing hust as good as yours. The resort to personal attack ("onanism") shows a lack of intellectual ammunition. Frankly, I think you owe wstera an apology. You have no way of knowing his personal habits and you know and I know it.