Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (262212)	11/26/2005 2:33:45 PM
From: Dan B.	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573901

LOL. What you are missing is that this is one case. That makes it anecdotal by definition. However too, you also miss that when the Fla. court approved an unconstitutional counting method, it behooved the USSC to stop it, and they did. States just should never have the right to approve unconstitutional and unfair counting methods. The USSC also settled the question as to whether to employ a fair recount method at the late date, by a 5-4 margin against. Shoot, if Gore had asked for something fair by the rules in the first place, we might have had a fair recounting long prior to the USSC's involvement. Legal appeals were exhausted and wasted by Gore's unfair requests...it would be hard for me to blame the USSC for it's 5-4 decision not to recount. Dan B.