Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (262304)	11/27/2005 8:00:49 AM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573941

"asking for an unfair and therefore unconstitutional recount, is not." Again, what part of the Constitution speaks about counting the votes for delegates to the Electorial College?

To: Dan B. who wrote (262304)	11/27/2005 4:51:26 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573941

You can spread that quote all day long, and only a very uncomprehending person would take it as you've put it. Truly. Asking for a recount is fine, asking for an unfair and therefore unconstitutional recount, is not. The latter is what I noticed Gore asking for, and so became one very appropriate issue which the Supreme Court ruled upon. The problem is not in my reading comprehension. The problem is in your presentation. Where does it say a recount is in violation of the Consitution? Wait. Let me refine it......where does it say Gore's specific request for a recount is in violation?