Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (262337)	11/27/2005 5:46:44 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573430

"Tell me, what part of the constitution guarantees that should be the case?" No part. Which is why I believe it should be a state issue. Now personally, I support a woman's right to choose, but it is something that should have been hashed out by the people. Having read the court document straylight.law.cornell.edu It says nothing about the recount being unconstitutional. It merely states that to do the recount would take too much time by the time the safeguards were put in place. Not the drivel you were saying about the methods being unconstitutional. Try getting the basic facts right for once.