Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (262342)	11/27/2005 6:17:38 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574079

"Democrats, as shown by this discussion, were willing to request plainly unfair countings of votes in order to win." Since you think you have a point here, what "plainly unfair countings" are you talking about? On the one hand, it seems as if you are claiming requesting a recount is unfair. On the other, you also seem to deny it. So what are you saying?

To: Dan B. who wrote (262342)	11/28/2005 4:45:13 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1574079

Of course Republicans wanted to win. Democrats, as shown by this discussion, were willing to request plainly unfair countings of votes in order to win. Maybe you could see fit to find that there are indeed TWO bottom lines at work here. I won't hold my breath for even that tiny bit of enlightenment to sink into you. Hmmm.......we've gone from unconstitutional to unfair recountings during the course of several posts. Not surprising. So what constitutes unfair recounting in your book? There were so many irregularities in the FLA vote........the entire vote count should have been recounted. After all, this election was for presidency and not some minor council office in a town of 15K people. The Dems were being way too nice. In WA state, the GOP demanded that the entire gubernatorial vote be recounted. DEMANDED!