Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan B. who wrote (71051)	11/28/2005 12:59:30 PM
From: Orcastraiter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 81568

By your admission we don't know what transpired in those meetings, and there were only a few of them. Saddam himself met with the US, including Rumsfeld, many many more times than Saddam's people met with Al Qaeda. The discussion is unknown. Therefore it is wrong to surmise that Iraq and Al Qaeda plotted against the US. We know that Saddam and the US plotted against the Soviets and Iran cause we were there, but we have no proof of what went on in those alleged meetings with Al Qaeda. Bush made a statement that requires knowledge of what transpired during the meetings. He had none. Therefore he may have surmised what went on, but he didn't know. His CIA said there was no collaboration. Which makes the statement "we removed an ally of Al Qaeda" unknowable, or a lie. Bush lied. For all we know, Saddam's men who met with Al Qaeda were plotting with UBL to take out Saddam. Orca