Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: unclewest who wrote (149102)	11/28/2005 7:23:18 PM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 793996

since all the data analysis done in the article is based on a false premise. In your earlier response you said the analysis used the wrong number. I understand your problem with that. But is the premise flawed, too? If so, how so? The analysis is interesting to me even if the math is wrong. It's always the concept that interests me. Inaccurate numbers may produce the wrong bottom line, but the model is still interesting to me. We have different purposes here. I understand that you care about accuracy in this case because you have an agenda that is harmed by the inaccuracy in the bottom line . I am indifferent to the bottom line calculation. I was just fascinated by the analysis. So, was the formula wrong or was the formula right but the calculation wrong? Go ahead and put me on ignore I have no cause to do that. I find your posts interesting and would not want to miss them.