Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLNI - Game Over -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Harold S. who wrote (34)	11/29/2005 10:08:38 AM
From: scion	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 12518

It's really quite simple Harold S. PLNI is telling investors the value of patents they claim as intellectual property is $20 million. The latest patent has not been assigned to PLNI: United States Patent D500,243, Turek December 28, 2004; Assignee: Turek, Sr.; James N. (Lexington, KY); Turek, II; James N. (Lexington, KY); Turek; Brandon D. (Lexington, KY It has been assigned to the Turek family. How can it then be claimed as a company-owned patent, whatever the value?

To: Harold S. who wrote (34)	11/29/2005 10:11:19 AM
From: rrufff	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 12518

Harold and Capt - you have made some excellent posts and I commend you for this board which welcomes a fair posting of pro and con comments. I made the mistake of asking wormie his point of view on PLNI, rather than his just asking a lot of rhetorical questions. I disclosed that I was not long PLNI, but watching and evaluating price vs. potential, particularly where he seemed to be leading an organized bashing troupe. I reasoned that if what he posted was factual and good information, then I would not buy. If, on the other hand, it was bash, with little substance, that pushed the stock down, I would consider buying at that point. I have no problems with posting of info that is negative and would prefer that to buying and then being blind-sided. In any event, all I got in response was a series of posts asking me questions on a stock I don't own and claiming that I like the stock. I think one moronic post even suggested that I must be paid to promote it. All this, I suppose, was intended to get me to admit that PLNI is a scam. These supposedly expert bashers were unable or unwilling to actually say it is a scam but they ask question upon question, of which most seem to be capable of multiple answers.