To: geode00 who wrote (176315 ) 11/29/2005 6:50:00 PM From: Maurice Winn Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500 <Democracy and capitalism are not equivalent. > That's correct. In fact, democracy is anti-capitalist in that democracies involve voters voting to take property from other people for their own purposes, all to often outright cash payments to themselves and their mates. But China is definitely not capitalist, though a lot more so than it was during Mao's MADness. There is nowhere which is capitalist, with high quality respect for private property. <I've heard that if China raised the standard of living of all of its people to that of Mexico, it would use as much energy all by itself as the entire world does today. Ooops. > You are obviously not keen on arithmetic. There are 6 billion people and only 1.3bn in China. That's quarter of the world. Of the 6 billion, about 1 billion are quite well off and use a LOT of energy. Mexico isn't included in that "well-off" number. If the 1.3 billion used the same per capita as Mexico, they'd use about a tenth of the energy that the entire world does. Even if you just consider the rest of the world, excluding China, it would still only be about quarter of the energy, at the most. More like a sixth. I don't think China has 300 million people missing. <China doesn't know if it has 1.2 or 1.5 billion people. Therefore, our 300 million is their rounding error. > I think you are prone to hyperbole and exaggeration. I quite like those too! <China has a long history of capitalism. If we don't knock off ruinous foreign ventures and ruinous tax&steal policies, we're going to fall very far behind and we're going to see the effects within the next decade. > By "very long" do you mean 10 or 20 years? China wasn't a capitalist country before that. It was communist. Before that, it was a kingdom/emperor type place and far from capitalist. I think the USA is doing very well and will continue to do so. The USA hasn't even charged for use of cyberspace. They could charge a LOT of money for that as they control it. Competitors could start up, but it would take a big effort and probably not succeed very much. The USA owns the US$ and is pixelating umpty$billions every year, which they own, diluting holders around the world. Plus, the USA is the world's best capitalist headquarters. I prefer to leave my capital there than in the clutches of Helengrad. Mqurice