Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Baker who wrote (93660)	11/29/2005 3:36:33 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Hello Dale, I believe that most of the 9/11 comments were stricken from the record by the court. That's why they're not abundant in the transcripts. At least that's what I believe, no proof... EK!!!

To: Dale Baker who wrote (93660)	11/29/2005 6:53:24 PM
From: SI Dave	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 122087

Dale, it isn't wishful thinking on my part, just my opinion based on what I have read here. Like I said, I have no idea if they are going to appeal on those grounds or not. Nor do I really care other than as an interested observer to the long-running saga, as I assume you and many others also are. As far as the number of federal criminal convictions overturned on appeal, you are probably correct that few are overturned on appeal. That could also be because post-conviction sentencing deals are often cut containing stipulations which preclude the ability to appeal. Does anyone know if the judge has accepted the jury's verdicts? For that matter, can a federal judge even choose to discard a jury verdict?