SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (42207)11/29/2005 8:12:01 PM
From: average joe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
The claim that Canada subsidizes our lumber industry via low stumpage rates is ridiculous. Low stumpage rates are low stumpage rates and nothing more.

Would you complain if I bought gas on the Canadian side of the border 10 cents cheaper to travel to Vegas that the Canadian government was subsidizing U.S. tourism.

Not to mention the fact the U.S. Department of Commerce investigated and concluded no duty on Canadian lumber was justified.



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (42207)11/30/2005 1:48:32 AM
From: Peter Dierks  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 90947
 
"resource based economies aren't all that rare."

Economies with little economic production other than resource extraction are almost universally the least free economies. It is the situation most conducive to corruption. One powerful leader can award resource allocations to cooperative parties.

Wait; does that remind anyone else of a recent UN program?



To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (42207)12/2/2005 11:29:08 AM
From: Solon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 90947
 
"Couldn't Canada negate the US claim simply by auctioning lumber rights on government land?"

"Would you or Solon care to answer that?"

There is no onus on Canada to jump through hoops to "negate" any claims. But yes, Canada could copy U.S. policy. Or the U.S. could comply with the findings of NAFTA and reduce its duty down to 13%. Or the U.S. could copy Canadian policy...

Let the lawyers work it out...