Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Just the Facts, Ma'am: A Compendium of Liberal Fiction -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (42211)	11/29/2005 7:24:02 PM
From: Alan Smithee	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 90947

I read your posts over there, and they do not appear to me to be in violation of anything in the thread description. Specifically, the thread header states: Perhaps it is possible to discuss this subject on SI. We'll see. Please don't bash gay people here. Not only is it rude, and mean, it just isn't going to convince anybody that your POV is right. Please don't bash any other poster either. Not only is it rude, and mean, it also isn't going to convince anybody that your POV is right (though it might convince some that your POV is morally bankrupt). Every post you post tells us how humane you are. Why don't you show us your humanity. Think before you post. And if you cannot say something nice, or at least say something politely, without being personal and mean, it would probably be better to post somewhere else. Thanks in advance Don't be annoying and expect to post here. Why anyone would expect other people to tolerate annoying posts when they don't have to is beyond me- but if you HAVE gone through your SI life expecting to be tolerated even though you are annoying, please revise your thinking now. I don't enjoy annoying. I'm sure there is someone else, somewhere else, who does- please go post to them. The thread head over there has been known to say, "criticize the post, not the poster" (paraphrased). Your bannination based on the two posts you made indicates that you have been banned because of who you are and your perceived past posting history, not because of anything you said.

To: The Philosopher who wrote (42211)	11/29/2005 11:20:05 PM
From: Lazarus_Long	Respond to of 90947

Why didn't someone warn the public that X the Unknown, aka Ionesco, is not going under the nom de guerre eleutheria? Actually, it was posted here. Lady Lurksalot caught the change quickly after it was made and notified me. Message 21915296 I found her new nom de guerre even more amusing than her last. Other than that, I agree with what Alan said. You were banned for who you were, not what you posted. Maybe YOU could try ab alias change. How about "With Liberty And Justice For All"? :-) FYI, Message 21926045 A true jewel Message 21923166