Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sam who wrote (176425)	11/30/2005 12:10:27 AM
From: KLP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

#1. What part of HIGHLY CLASSIFIED BRIEFING didn't anyone understand? #2. For those who don't understand the above, how do you feel about giving the entire world every shred of info that the US has? #3. For those who do give this info, are they traitors? #4. WHO exactly knows exactly what was in this report, and who said what, using what source material? #5. Does "no evidence" mean that we weren't good enough to find evidence, or was there REALLY no evidence... Funny, both Democrat and Repubs and many leaders of the world had been saying there WAS plenty of evidence for several years. Ten days after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, President Bush was told in a highly classified briefing that the U.S. intelligence community had no evidence linking the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein to the attacks and that there was scant credible evidence that Iraq had any significant collaborative ties with Al Qaeda, according to government records and current and former officials with firsthand knowledge of the matter.