Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lou Weed who wrote (176488)	11/30/2005 11:11:37 AM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Americans weren't supplying 85% of the forces and taking all of the casualties.....its just not the same thing for the love of God Come on Michael.. Don't you remember "Lend-Lease".. or the fact that Free French forces were almost completely outfitted with US made equipment? British Firefly Tanks, mounting their 17 pound cannon, or their commom use of Sherman Tanks? No, WWII was primarily a battle of American and British (including colonial) forces against the combined armies of Germany, Japan, and Italy. Here's a list of the combatants involved in WWII and the casualty counts they suffered. web.jjay.cuny.edu Maybe less of a "world war" than is normally the perception, eh? Hawk