Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Geoff Altman who wrote (715890)	11/30/2005 12:22:39 PM
From: JDN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Now, contrast that thoughtful, insightful speech based upon PERSONAL OBSERVATION with the tirades by Pelosi, Reid, Kerry and others and tell me, which makes more sense? jdn

To: Geoff Altman who wrote (715890)	12/1/2005 3:46:27 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Iraqi adviser predicts looming US pull-out By Roula Khalaf, Middle East Editor Published: December 1 2005 02:00 Last updated: December 1 2005 02:00 Iraq's national security adviser is predicting that as many as 60,000 US-led coalition troops will be withdrawn by the end of next year, with most of the rest leaving by the end of 2007. Muaffak al-Rubbaie, a Shia politician who also co-chairs the committee responsible for security transfers to Iraqi forces, told the Financial Times his predictions did not constitute a timetable for withdrawal but a condition-based assessment. President George W. Bush yesterday rejected a timetable for the return of US troops and said conditions on the ground would determine when forces were pulled out. But Mr Rubbaie's statements are the clearest indication yet that the Iraqi government that will emerge after the December 15 elections could press for a tentative withdrawal schedule for the nearly 137,000 US troops regularly in Iraq. He insisted that Iraqi security forces were now ready and capable of taking control of 14 out of Iraq's 18 provinces and suggested the committee, co-chaired by the US, was now drafting an implementation plan for the transfer of security. Mr Rubbaie emphasised the changing political environment and the recent engagement of Sunni Arabs, who dominate the insurgency but had boycotted the January elections, in the political process. He also insisted that security had improved, saying the conflict had reached a tipping point in recent weeks, with US and Iraqi forces winning the upper hand against the insurgents. "We're so confident that 30,000 coalition troops will go home in the first part of 2006 and another 30,000 in the second part of the year, and all by the end of 2007," he said. "We're not asking for a timetable but all the signals indicate we may be talking about the departure of most of the multinational forces by the end of 2007." Mr Rubbaie's statements come during an election campaign in which politicians are keen to emphasise that the unpopular US military presence is ending. He is running on the ticket of the United Iraqi Alliance, the Islamist Shia coalition that won last January's elections, a performance it is hoping to repeat this month. His assessment raises the prospects that a victory by the UIA could lead to a schedule for withdrawal. The US has won a new United Nations Security Council mandate for its military control in Iraq but a review is due in the middle of next year. Coalition officials say the Iraqi government may then ask for a status of forces agreement, which would determine the level of troops. An accelerated withdrawal, however, would risk sinking Iraq into civil war. Western diplomats and experts say the Iraqi police force is heavily infiltrated by Islamist Shia militia, some of whom have been accused of torturing and killing Sunni Arab detainees. Military experts also cast doubt on the readiness of military units to lead the fight against insurgents. Mr Rubbaie estimated that 50 per cent of Iraqi troops - 217,000 police and army forces - were now well trained and ready for combat. "The insurgents, terrorists are now on the run . . . their networks in the north and western part of the country have been disrupted," he said. But statistics compiled by the Brookings Institution show a far gloomier picture. Anti-coalition attacks have surged in recent months, rising from about 45 each day in March to 100 in October, says Brookings. American soldiers were also killed at a rate of about three each day in October and November, up from a rate of fewer than two a day in March and April. In an influential call for complete American withdrawal, pro-military US congressman John Murtha recently cited a continued increase in insurgent activity as the "most important" reason behind his change of heart. Additional reporting by Peter Spiegel in London Find this article at: news.ft.com

To: Geoff Altman who wrote (715890)	12/1/2005 6:36:23 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Bush Administration’s “Victory” Strategy Leaves Major Questions Unanswered Lengthy Document Fails to Provide Path for Exiting Iraq (Washington, D.C.) Wednesday, the Bush Administration, working in tandem with the National Security Council issued a document entitled National Strategy for Victory in Iraq, a weak attempt to counter the growing criticism of the administration’s handling of the Iraq occupation, and increasing discontent with the country’s overall foreign policy objectives. Instead of providing a detailed, honest plan for removing American soldiers from harm’s way in Iraq, the 35-page document outlines a set of vague goals that appear to be nothing more than exhausted, political rhetoric. Although the paper is filled with subheadings containing glittering generalities such as “Victory in Iraq is a Vital U.S. Interest,” and “Failure is Not an Option,” it fails to answer essential questions about the methodology and timeframe for troop withdrawal. The “Victory” Strategy only reinforces Bush’s unsupported claims that current policies are “working” and cites as one of the administration’s accomplishments “the increasing capability of those [Iraqi] forces to take on the terrorists and secure the nation.” After nearly three years, the facts show that only one Iraqi battalion exists with the capability of to operate independently. “This ‘Victory’ Strategy is an irrefutably weak attempt by the Bush Administration to satisfy domestic political pressures while evading the issue of exiting Iraq,” stated Michael Dixon, Chairman of the Libertarian National Committee. “While President Bush dances around the flagrant failures of his decision to invade and remain in Iraq, American military personnel continue to be wounded and killed on a daily basis. To date, the Libertarian Party remains the only political group that has devised a sensible plan for American withdrawal from Iraq.” To learn more about the Libertarian Party’s Iraq Exit Strategy, visit www.lp.org/plan.