Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Is Secession Doable? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GUSTAVE JAEGER who wrote (1952)	12/1/2005 7:18:42 AM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1968

Gus > But then you must be consistent with such a whopping premise: if mininukes were indeed planted in the towers, who needs "suicide airliners" anymore??!?!?!?? The object wasn't just to destroy the buildings but to provide a credible story that Arabs did it -- and the hijacking of four airplanes provides that. Last time they tried to do it without the planes and the whole exercise was a balls-up. But maybe that was a trial run? I know the story of the hijacking of four airliners by people who could hardly fly is both tenuous and suspect, likewise that of the Arabs who allegedly did it and are alive afterwards. I also know that very few actually saw the plane hit WTC1, but some did. In fact, many people saw, and with their own eyes and not just on TV, a plane striking WTC2. What kind of planes these were is another matter? Likewise, the Pentagon. And, indeed, there are quite a few who saw Flight 93, or what they believed to be Flight 93, which blew up or was shot down near Pittsburg. In fact, a little white plane was also seen near to this airplane. Neither of us were there that day so we can only know what happened by what we read and see in the media -- and also what we imagine. I am nevertheless satisfied that airplanes were used on 9/11 and I know many other skeptics of the official story are too.