Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (176674)	12/1/2005 9:55:20 AM
From: Wharf Rat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

So do you still think this,even tho Russia was responsible for 80% of the German casualties? "No, WWII was primarily a battle of American and British (including colonial) forces against the combined armies of Germany, Japan, and Italy" Message 21930705

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (176674)	12/1/2005 12:51:55 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Stalin was evil but his expansion was more to produce buffer states than world domination. For Stalin world domination would be that of communism coming thru revolutions that the soviets would aid and abet. Hitler was different. I found the story of the drug taking if true to be very instructive. With Hitler it was all about the master race destroying the inferior ones and somehow controlling others with good racial stock. Anyone who thinks we didnt have a dog in that fight is dead wrong. mike