Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paret who wrote (176792)	12/2/2005 10:24:29 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I wish you could stop concocting such silly fantasies.

To: paret who wrote (176792)	12/2/2005 11:16:57 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

So why do cons tolerate Mugabe, mullahs in iran, north korea regime, sudan atrocities and so on. Lets be real. Saddam was considered low hanging fruit and we easily won the war. What we didnt count on was post war. The others arent so easy or in a critical area like the mideasat or involved with oil. We should treat these issues as grownups. Personally i think history will judge removal of saddam as important. Whether it ultimately improves things much is debatable at this point. The collapse of the Soviet Union was a great thing but it has made the world more complicated for both russia and the US. Doesnt mean we should reconstitute USSR or saddam for that matter. mike