SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: LindyBill who wrote (149534)12/2/2005 7:43:56 PM
From: KLP  Respond to of 793782
 
Therein lies the difference between the Repubs and Dems: So a decision had to be made: Act against a potential threat (with more than a dozen additional reasons to carry out the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998) or cross our fingers and hope for the best – the prevailing U.S. policy toward terrorist threats pre-9.11.

The previous Adm had ignored all signs for their 8 years, and even years before that.

After 9-11, eventually everyone in the country had an indication that this was serious, and the Repubs took it as a serious threat.

The Dems, from the sounds of things, would continue ignoring the situation, and let us be hit again.

Past performance indicates future behavior generally.



To: LindyBill who wrote (149534)12/3/2005 9:39:49 AM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 793782
 
I find it amusing that Schumer can quantify the information and then make an argument. Well the meaningless mind can do the darnest things.

Maybe they did a poll in Iraq and that's how they came up with the 90 10.