SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : PLNI - Game Over -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: catattack76 who wrote (244)12/2/2005 1:34:14 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 12518
 
Bankruptcy

What happens when a public company files for protection under the federal bankruptcy laws? Who protects the interests of investors? Do the old securities have any value when, and if, the company is reorganized?

Federal bankruptcy laws govern how companies go out of business or recover from crippling debt. A bankrupt company might use Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code to reorganize its business and try to become profitable again. Management continues to run the day-to-day business operations but all significant business decisions must be approved by a bankruptcy court.

Under Chapter 7, the company stops all operations and goes completely out of business. A trustee is appointed to "liquidate" (sell) the company's assets and the money is used to pay off the debt, which may include debts to creditors and investors.

Most public companies will file under Chapter 11 rather than Chapter 7 because they can still run their business and control the bankruptcy process.

In most bankruptcy cases, the role of the SEC is limited. The SEC will review the disclosure document to determine if the company is telling investors and creditors the important information they need to know, and to ensure that stockholders are represented by an official committee if appropriate.

Although the SEC does not negotiate the economic terms of reorganization plans, we may take a position on important legal issues that will affect the rights of investors in other bankruptcy cases as well. For example, the SEC may step in if we believe that the company's officers and directors are using the bankruptcy laws to shield themselves from lawsuits for securities fraud.

You can obtain more information by reading the SEC’s brochure on corporate bankruptcy, and the Bankruptcy Judges Division’s Public Information Series pamphlet on Bankruptcy Basics.

sec.gov



To: catattack76 who wrote (244)12/2/2005 1:38:02 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 12518
 
Company officers are required to disclose to investors, via annual reports and securities offerings, any past corporate bankruptcies they've been involved with. Federal securities regulations call for disclosure for five years after the bankruptcy filing, and this applies to any officer who either worked at the company at the time of the filing or left within two years prior to the filing.

Bankruptcy not a stigma for some CEOs

By Dawn Kawamoto
news.com.com

Jeffrey Sheahan is the latest ex-CEO with the bankruptcy blues.
The chief executive of Egghead.com joins a growing number of former chief executives who saw their companies file for bankruptcy and are now looking for the next opportunity in a tough market. The bankruptcy isn't a bright spot on his record, but the stigma generally attached to the label is fading.

In part, that's because there are so many companies going bankrupt that it's seen as more common, and partly because there is an understanding that the rapid deflation of the tech market also sucked down good companies with good ideas, industry observers say. But it can still be a black mark.

"CEOs who worked at big companies with $50 million in revenues have a bigger stigma attached to them," said Jon Holman, founder of executive recruiting company the Holman Group. "That kind of company already has products in the market place and you can talk to customers, look at the balance sheet and see where the revenues are coming from. So, it's hard to make the case you were later snookered, or that you thought the technology worked and it didn't. Odds are much greater it was something where you didn't do something well."

Sheahan doesn't need to be told that twice--he's already been asking himself the tough questions about what went wrong at Egghead.com, which filed for a Chapter 11 re-organization bankruptcy in August.

"This is not the scenario one envisions when you take the reins of a company," Sheahan said. "A feeling that you failed in some respect is difficult to handle emotionally and intellectually.

"You use this moment to reflect on what you could have done differently, how much of it was the environment, how much of it was you personally. And although I became CEO at a time when (business-to-consumer) companies were having a difficult time, you feel you have the intelligence and team to figure it out," said Sheahan, who joined the online software retailer in 1998 as chief operating officer and became CEO in 2000.

He's got plenty of company, since Egghead is just one of thousands of companies that have filed for Chapter 11 since the market's steep downturn. The Administrative Office of U.S. Courts reports that during the 12-month period ending June 30, fully 10,272 companies have filed for Chapter 11, up 18 percent from the market's euphoric days of 1999.

Headhunters, investment bankers and institutional investors say that while bankruptcies generally don't totally derail CEOs, they are red flags for future employers. More than one bankruptcy is a bad sign. And so is going bankrupt in a well-funded sector.

"If a (business-to-consumer) company went bankrupt, there's virtually no reason to explain why," Holman said. "Everyone knows funding dried up. But if it was a technology company, like a semiconductor company or an Internet infrastructure company, then a venture capitalist or a company is likely to dig a little deeper, because those kind of companies continued to get funded."

Do tell
And former CEOs have to expect some tough scrutiny from boards of directors and investors, who often rank management among their top criteria when evaluating an investment. Companies that are raising capital will not only have to pitch their product to prospective investors, they'll also have to explain the circumstances behind their CEO's past bankruptcy.

"If a private company failed, investors tend to be comfortable with that. But if a CEO of a publicly held company filed for bankruptcy and investors lost a lot of money, it will certainly affect the view on that CEO next time around," said Tony Meneghetti, who heads up Deutsche Banc Alex Brown's West Coast technology investment group. "If, for example, George Shaheen of Webvan joined another company and was soliciting investments, we'd still talk to Webvan's old investors but we'd expect the hurdle to be higher."

Egghead's Sheahan said he's ready.

"There is nothing I enjoy more than getting in front of investors and telling them what transpired and explaining honestly what I did and didn't do well. I'm not going to be apologetic or dismiss it--just explain what happened. I believe the truth sets you free in your personal life and business life," Sheahan said. "I know we lost a lot of money for some investors and they may not be able to overcome that, but some investors are also appreciative that we made a lot of money for them, too."

Institutional investors, such as mutual funds and pension funds, say they aren't necessarily skittish when it comes to investing in companies headed by CEOs who once lead companies that eventually filed for bankruptcy.

"I wouldn't blackball a CEO just because they had a bankruptcy," said Robb Parlanti, senior portfolio manager for Turner Investment Partners, which has $7.6 billion in assets under management. "There were a lot of bankruptcies in the communications and services space, so you just have to look at how the company did when the markets were strong and in their heyday."

Since that heyday, there have been dozens of high-profile boom-and-bust CEOs. Other former CEOs have laid low since their high-profile bankruptcy, such as eToys' Toby Lenk, who says he is working on various projects but doesn't want to discuss them in the media.

Several CEOs left their companies just before they filed for bankruptcy, such as Webvan's Shaheen and Exodus' Ellen Hancock. Shaheen, who left as Webvan faced delisting and three months before it filed for bankruptcy, is now mostly active with various board directorships. Hancock, who had stints at IBM, Apple Computer and National Semiconductor before growing Exodus to the industry's largest Web-hosting company, left just weeks before Exodus filed.

"Not a resume builder"
But these high-profile executives are likely to resurface in similar jobs, headhunters say, since they have extensive experience. Some are even hoping the executives will lead them to the next hot company or technology.

For example, Parlanti said he's watching Alex Mandl, who was president of AT&T before joining wireless-communications company Teligent. Mandl left Teligent one month before it filed for Chapter 11 in May. Like Lenk, Mandl said he is working on several projects but didn't want to discuss them.

"I'd absolutely be interested in investing in any company (Mandl) joins...he gave it a shot and it doesn't mean the next thing he does wouldn't work," Parlanti said.

Company officers are required to disclose to investors, via annual reports and securities offerings, any past corporate bankruptcies they've been involved with. Federal securities regulations call for disclosure for five years after the bankruptcy filing, and this applies to any officer who either worked at the company at the time of the filing or left within two years prior to the filing.

"It's not a resume builder. There's no way you can turn that into a win situation. People don't want to disclose it, since there is no upside to it," said Victoria Wayne, managing director for executive search company Christian & Timbers. "There are some people who go to troubled companies to try to dig them out. Those CEOs inherit a real mess. They can later say it was so big and so bad that I wasn't able to turn it around, but in some cases it also reflects on their judgment."

Despite Wayne's words of caution, Sheahan said his experience has left him "battle tested" and looking for challenging opportunities.

"I don't want to walk into a company that is operating as smoothly as heck, I'd like to help turn it around," Sheahan said. "I can't take this experience and suddenly get gun-shy. This experience hasn't scarred me to the point where I'm going to change my makeup and character...I plan to do my due diligence on a company as any candidate would, and I'm not going into a situation expecting this to happen again."

news.com.com



To: catattack76 who wrote (244)12/2/2005 1:41:36 PM
From: scion  Respond to of 12518
 
How Do I Get Information About Companies?

If you're working with a broker or an investment adviser, he or she can provide you with information about the company and its disclosure documents. Be sure to read carefully the prospectus and the company's latest financial reports. Remember that unsolicited emails, message board postings, and company news releases should never be used as the sole basis for your investment decisions. You can also get information on your own from these sources:

From the company Ask the company if it is registered with the SEC and files reports with us. If the company is small and unknown to most people, you should also call your state securities regulator to get information about the company, its management, and the brokers or promoters who've encouraged you to invest in the company.

From the SEC A great many companies must file their reports with the SEC. Using the EDGAR database, you can find out whether a company files with us and get any reports in which you're interested. For companies that do not file on EDGAR, check with the SEC's Public Reference Room to see whether the company has filed an offering circular under Regulation A.

From your state securities regulator We strongly urge you to contact your state securities regulator to find out whether they have information about a company and the people behind it. Look in the government section of your phone book or visit the website of the North American Securities Administrators Association to get the name and phone number. Even though the company does not have to register its securities with the SEC, it may have to register them with your state. Your regulator will tell you whether the company has been legally cleared to sell securities in your state. Too many investors could easily have avoided heavy and painful financial losses if they only called their state securities regulator before they bought stock.

From other government regulators Many companies, such as banks, do not have to file reports with the SEC. But banks must file updated financial information with their banking regulators. Visit the Federal Reserve System's National Information Center of Banking Information site at www.ffiec.gov/NIC, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency at www.occ.treas.gov, or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation at www.fdic.gov.

From reference books and commercial databases Visit your local public library or the nearest law or business school library. You'll find many reference materials containing information about companies. You can also access commercial databases for more information about the company's history, management, products or services, revenues, and credit ratings. The SEC cannot recommend or endorse any particular research firm, its personnel, or its products. But there are a number of commercial resources you may consult, including: Bloomberg, Dun & Bradstreet, Hoover's Profiles, Lexis-Nexis, and Standard & Poor's Corporate Profiles. Ask your librarian about additional resources.

From the Secretary of State where the company is incorporated Contact the secretary of state where the company is incorporated to find out whether the company is a corporation in good standing. You may also be able to obtain copies of the company's incorporation papers and any annual reports it files with the state. Please visit the National Association of Secretaries of State website at www.nass.org for contact information regarding a particular Secretary of State.

sec.gov



To: catattack76 who wrote (244)12/2/2005 1:44:19 PM
From: scion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12518
 
What Are the "Red Flags"?

It can be extraordinarily difficult to detect fraud or a manipulative scheme. But when you're researching a company, watch out for these "red flags":

SEC Trading Suspensions

The SEC has the power to suspend trading in any stock for up to 10 days when it believes that information about the company is inaccurate or unreliable. Think twice before investing in a company that's been the subject of an SEC trading suspension. You'll find information about trading suspensions on the SEC's website.

Company Recommended But No Current Information

Be especially careful if you receive an unsolicited fax or e-mail about a company -- or see it praised on an Internet bulletin board -- but can find no current financial information about the company from other independent sources. Many fraudsters use e-mail, faxes and Internet postings to tout thinly traded stocks, in the hopes that the resulting buying frenzy will push the share price up so that they can sell their shares. Once they dump their stock and quit promoting the company, the share price quickly falls.

High Pressure Sales Tactics

Beware of salespeople who pressure you to buy before you have a chance to think about and investigate the "opportunity." Dishonest people may try to tell you about a "once-in-a-lifetime" opportunity or one that's based on "inside" or "confidential" information. Don't fall for a promise of spectacular profits or "guaranteed" returns. These are the hallmarks of fraud. If the deal sounds too good to be true, then it probably is.

Assets Are Large But Revenues Are Small

Companies will sometimes assign high values on their financial statements to assets that have nothing to do with their business. Find out whether there's a valid explanation for low revenues, especially when the company claims to have large assets.

Odd Items in the Footnotes to the Financial Statements

Many fraud schemes involve unusual transactions among individuals connected to the company. These can be unusual loans or the exchange of questionable assets for company stock that may be discussed in the footnotes.

Unusual Auditing Issues

Be wary when a company's auditors have refused to certify the company's financial statements or if they've stated that the company may not have enough money to continue operating. Also question any change of accountants.

Insiders Own Large Amounts of the Stock

In many fraud cases - especially "pump and dump" schemes - the company's officers and promoters own significant amounts of the stock. When one person or group controls most of the stock, they can more easily manipulate the stock's price at your expense. You can ask your broker or the company whether one person or group controls most of the company's stock, but if the company is the subject of a scam, you may not get an honest answer.

Additional Warning Signs

Don't deal with anyone who refuses to provide you with written information about the investments they're promoting. Never tell a cold caller your social security number or numbers for your banking and securities accounts. And be extra wary if someone you don't know and trust recommends foreign or "off-shore" investments. For more tips on avoiding danger, be sure to read Cold Calling and The Fleecing of Foreign Investors.

sec.gov



To: catattack76 who wrote (244)12/2/2005 1:50:31 PM
From: scion  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12518
 
Disclosure Requirements

The California Act also requires a “publicly traded company”—one with securities traded on a national or foreign stock exchange or as to which two-way (bid and asked) prices are regularly published in the National Daily Quotation Service or similar service—to include in its annual information statement the following new information (Corp C §1502):

The identity of its independent auditors and a description of any non-audit services performed by the auditors within the previous 24 months;
The date of the most recent audit report by the corporation’s independent auditors, along with a copy of the audit report (but not the audited financial statements themselves):
The “annual compensation” paid to each director and the top five executive officers of the corporation, including the number of shares or options that “were not available to other employees”;
The amount and terms of any loans at a “preferential loan rate” made by the corporation to any director or executive officer during the previous 24 months; and
Whether, during the past 10 years, the corporation or any of its directors or executive officers:
Filed for bankruptcy;

Was convicted of fraud; or
Was found liable for more than $10,000 for violations of any federal security laws or any security or banking provision of California law.
The requirements of the California Act, which can be found in Corp C §§1502, 1502.5, and 2117, present a number of concerns for public companies incorporated or doing business in California, because the authors of the Act made no attempt to coordinate its requirements with current SEC reporting requirements. For example, the information statement under the California Act is to be filed each year during the month in which the public company was incorporated or first qualified to do business in California. Because this is unlikely to coincide with the due date of the company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q or annual report on Form 10-K, the company may have to file with the SEC a current report on Form 8-K concurrently with the filing of the annual information statement setting forth any “material” information from the information statement.

Also, the specific information called for in the annual information statement does not necessarily correspond to similar information called for by SEC rules and regulations, so public companies will have to determine to what extent they must modify their SEC disclosures to make them suitable to include in their annual information statements. It has been suggested by some commentators that public companies may want to form California subsidiaries to conduct their business in California in order to avoid the requirements of the California Act.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and its Aftermath*
troygould.com