SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Spekulatius who wrote (22701)12/3/2005 6:22:17 AM
From: blankmind  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78476
 
Spek,

- thanks for confirming that mhc shares shouldn't count against the total shs o/s - at least not until they're issued

- ISBC has better earnings than Clifton. But if you read the 424's - concerning real estate owned - you'll see that for ISBC - per pg 103 - they lease about 2/3 of their branches - so no real hidden value here

- vs. CSBK - they’re probably sitting on millions of $$’s of real estate - as they own 8 of 10 offices - most purchased around 1975 - so when/if these banks are taken over - clifton is 2 years earlier out of the gate - & could be the better play - good luck



To: Spekulatius who wrote (22701)1/26/2006 10:23:33 PM
From: Spekulatius  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78476
 
OSHC, ISBC MHC's. flatish performance for both of my NJ MHC stocks. 9c earnings per share for OSHC and somewhat less for the much larger ISBC with some loan growth and little growth in deposits is not that exciting and also not surprising given the inverted yield curve. Stocks have been creeping up very slowly and i am holding.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News