Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mary Cluney who wrote (6091)	12/3/2005 10:12:02 AM
From: Rambi	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 542169

YEs- later on in this exchange, I posted that I had read (skimmed) the Rizzo article and pointed out that he HAD listed the reasons, although I found them extremely biased in his use of descriptors. Karen responded that the reasons certainly gave his basis for Bush being a poor president, but didn't set up a hierarchy or comparison of why he is the worst, which would be necessary for the use of the term WORST. I buy that argument based on the logic, but think that he gave enough information on his reasoning to remove the term WORST from the hyperbolic category. (Karen and I tend to like the nitpicky stuff more than many.) I still think that the article was excellent, and have read it three times now and look forward to Part II. I am just really sorry that he used such a polarizing statement as his starting point because it did detract from his message.