Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ChrisJP who wrote (45417)	12/4/2005 8:39:50 PM
From: Sea Otter	Respond to of 306849

Barrons Article on Housing Bubble "caveat emptor on anything that approaches 150% GDP .." === Which leads us to the accompanying chart, which we're also indebted to David for. As the subheading explains, that single line rising toward the heavens depicts the share of household real-estate assets as a percentage of gross domestic product. It's a graphic (in every sense of the word) description of the fantastic rise of the housing bubble. And it's eerily reminiscent of the charts that frequently enlivened this space at the top of the bull market in the late 'Nineties portraying the enormity of the equity bubble. As David warns, "Caveat emptor whenever anything approaches 150% of GDP." There are, as we may have pointed out before in discussing housing, any number of reasons to be wary. Among them: Affordability is at a 14-year low; the sales of new and existing homes are leveling off or worse, even as prices continue to rise; inventories of unsold homes are more than ample; mortgage applications are running some 20% below the summer's high; and even a few -- make that a very few -- home builders insist that business is as good as it gets, but could get better. Moreover, the regulators are growing restless, as they inevitably do when denial can no longer serve as adequate policy to cope with a speculative frenzy that's reaching fever pitch. According to a recent report by Ed Hyman's estimable ISI, the Comptroller of the Currency, the Fed, the FDIC and their kin who oversee the thrifts and the credit unions are busily drawing up drafts of rules they plan to issue before year-end to seriously tighten standards on risky loans. Not surprisingly, those risky loans, ISI elaborates, are those that cheerfully don't require the consumer to pay down principal; for their part, the originators of such loans, a famously tender bunch fearful above all of offending borrowers, haven't the foggiest real notion as to whether said consumer can afford the house he's buying. Since these exceedingly risky loans are, in ISI's words, "ubiquitous" a crackdown on them could, the firm not unreasonably warns, "have a significant impact on the housing market, bank-lending activity and the broader economy, beginning in the first half of next year." What has made the regulators more than a little antsy is that many of the folks taking interest-only or so-called option adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs in the popular parlance) are due for brutal "payment shock" when the loans reset, as a heap of them are slated to do over the next several years. Resetting, in this instance, means that the suddenly-not-so-happy home owner, besides higher interest rates, will have to start paying down the principal, a double whammy that could raise his monthly mortgage payments by 50%, even 100%. Since the bulk of option ARMs and interest-only loans are also "stated income" loans, in which the bank cheerfully accepts as income whatever the borrower says it is and no documentation is required, the shock -- and the consequences -- are sure to be that much greater for the borrower. In the circumstances, lenders might begin to feel a bit queasy as well. Such risky (to put it mildly) loans, ISI reports, may account for nearly half of all the loans made in the past 18 months.. online.barrons.com