Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (149771)	12/5/2005 5:19:19 AM
From: John Carragher	Respond to of 793838

i would agree with dems do not want to upset the green folks who are a big source of their votes so they maintain the position of clean fuels and alternate at the cost of low income low middle income people who do not know better but vote as told or with the crowd of union, teacher leaders. for example who ever let the electric companies change from heavy fuels and coal to known limit supply of natural gas to avoid cleaning up their operation of generating electricity. they know demand about 30% of household natural gas. This blindness by congress to go along with the switches to turbines that only burn natural gas all closed major chemical factories and forced them over seas and loss of jobs. we can thank the democrat org for these penalties to low income and low middle income hardships .