SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Israel to U.S. : Now Deal with Syria and Iran -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sea_urchin who wrote (9413)12/7/2005 3:41:22 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22250
 
Re: Sharon said the West has the military capabilities to handle Iran, but "before anyone decides on a military step, every effort would be made to pressure Iran to halt this activity. It seems to me such efforts can be fruitful," he said.

And I agree with him that the military option is not at the top of the list.


But there's no other "option" on the list.... clue:

Published on 30 Nov 2004 by Asia Times. Archived on 30 Nov 2004.

China-Iran tango threatens US leverage
by Antoaneta Bezlova

BEIJING
- After a week of intense bargaining, Iran has again agreed to suspend its uranium enrichment program to avert United Nations sanctions, further undermining US-led international efforts to curb Tehran's nuclear capabilities. And with the emergence of an ever-stronger partnership between China and Iran, Washington's woes are far from over.

This was clearly evident when Seyed Hossein Mussavian, Iran's envoy to the United Nations nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), visited the Chinese capital on the eve of an IAEA board meeting last week to review an investigation of suspect Iranian activities.

The United States contends that Iran is trying to develop nuclear weapons - an accusation that Tehran denies, insisting its nuclear ambitions are for peaceful purposes.

According to Mussavian, Chinese Foreign Ministry officials told him that Beijing wants to see Iran's nuclear program handled by the Vienna-based IAEA. "They are against referral of the Iranian issue to the Security Council," he told news agencies. Iran could face sanctions if the investigation is turned over to the UN.

But in agreeing to a comprehensive suspension of all nuclear activities that could yield fuel for nuclear weapons on the weekend, Iran has bought itself more time. The agreement itself was due to be presented to the IAEA on Monday. Under the terms of the deal, Tehran pledged to suspend all activities related to plutonium reprocessing and the enrichment of uranium, a process which can be used to create nuclear weapons.

In return, France, Britain and Germany - the European Union's so-called "Big 3" - have offered a package of economic and political carrots, including a promise to build a light-water nuclear reactor.

Iran last week threatened to derail the entire deal by requesting that 20 uranium enriching centrifuges be exempt from the bargain. Under intense international pressure, Tehran withdrew the demand.

How China's energy hunger safeguards Iran

Regardless of the deal, the success of any UN action against Iran hinges on Beijing's support, as it is one of five permanent members of the UN Security Council with veto-yielding power. And China, which has longstanding ties with Iran, just happens to be searching for new energy reserves to drive its booming economy.

Iranian Petroleum Minister Bijan Zandaneh told China Business Weekly recently that Tehran wants China to replace Japan as the biggest importer of its oil and gas. "Japan is our No 1 energy importer due to historical reasons, but we would like to give preference to exports to China," Zanganeh commented during his visit to Beijing in late October.

Earlier this month, Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing, who has just crowned a year of negotiations between the two countries, paid a rare visit to Tehran. In a meeting with Iranian President Mohammad Khatami, Li said Beijing would oppose US efforts to refer Iran to the UN Security Council over its nuclear program.

The Chinese foreign minister also told Khatami he had discussed Iran's nuclear issue with US Secretary of State Colin Powell and British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, and made it known to them that Iran was cooperating well with the IAEA. According to Li, referring Iran to the Security Council would only make things more complicated.

While commercial contacts between Beijing and Tehran are at the core of the relationship, and are set to grow significantly, wider geopolitical elements are also coming into play. Russia, India and other states may be encouraged to break ranks on the nuclear issue if they see China profiting from a strategic relationship with Iran.

Japan, which is even more reliant than China on oil imports, might be unwilling to cede its share of Iran's resources to Beijing and would likely resist US pressure to punish Tehran for nuclear proliferation. There are indications that Tokyo might oppose Washington's efforts to apply sanctions in a bid to force foreign companies to pull out of Iran's oil fields.

China, which has become the world's second largest oil importer over the past decade, currently gets 13.6% of its oil imports from Iran. Beijing has said it also wants to step up imports of Iran's natural gas. Trade between the two countries hit a record US$4 billion in 2003 - with Iran exporting crude worth $2.5 billion to China.

"As China's booming economy has turned the country into one of the biggest oil consumers in the world, Iran - as OPEC's [Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries'] second-largest crude oil supplier [after Saudi Arabia] - can only be a natural partner for China," Zanganeh told China Business Weekly.

Iran has an estimated 26.6 trillion-cubic-meter gas reservoir, the second largest in the world. One of China's four major state oil companies - the Sinopec Group - is being invited to prepare a master plan for the development of the giant Yadavaran gas field. This means a comprehensive development, including exploration and drilling, petrochemical and gas industries, pipelines and other services.

In return, Sinopec Group will buy 250 million tonnes of Iranian liquefied natural gas over 25 years. The deal, outlined in an October 28 memorandum of understanding between the two sides, is the largest Iran has signed since 1996. The Yadavaran deal could well be worth between $70 billion-$100 billion and could help propel Sinopec into the ranks of the world's major oil players.

In the long term, Beijing also hopes to secure a pipeline project in Iran taking oil 386 kilometers to the Caspian Sea where it could link with another planned pipeline from Kazakhstan to China.

For its part, Tehran is turning to China to build motorways and underground railway lines in the Iranian capital. After completing the first stage of the Tehran Metro, China North Industries Corp (NORINCO) - Beijing's military-run industrial and trade conglomerate - will build a second line in a contract worth $836 million.

NORINCO beat Germany's Siemens and South Korean bidders for the 19-kilometer link and will be the top contender to build four other planned lines, including a 30 kilometer track to the airport.

Meanwhile Iran's increasing appetite for consumer goods is bound to provide huge opportunities for Chinese companies eager to expand overseas. For example, China's home-grown automakers' initial foray overseas took them to Iran where Chery Automobile Co Ltd opened its first overseas production plant in the country in February 2003. Today, the plant manufactures 30,000 Chery cars annually.

China and Iran are currently cooperating on 100-odd different projects, according to diplomats.

The economic ties between two of Asia's oldest civilizations will have broad political implications for the United States. Beijing's inroads into Iran's energy sector will hamper US efforts to keep Tehran under pressure through the economic embargo imposed in April 1995 under then president Bill Clinton and the subsequent Iran-Libya Sanctions Act in August 1996, which sanctions companies that invest $40 million or more annually in oil and gas projects in Iran or Libya.

US officials are also concerned that some Chinese firms may be supplying missile technology and dual-use chemical weapons-related production equipment. In the past, Washington has applied sanctions against 13 foreign companies which have sold dual-use equipment or technology to Iran, including offshoots of NORINCO.

(Inter Press Service)
energybulletin.net



To: sea_urchin who wrote (9413)12/7/2005 6:34:40 AM
From: Crimson Ghost  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 22250
 
RETURNING TO ISRAEL FROM AUSTRALIA

[Avigail Abarbanel is a pyschoterapist in Australia. She writes, "I was
born in Israel in 1964 and grew up in Bat Yam, a working-class satellite
suburb south of Tel Aviv. . . After finishing high school in 1982 I
served my compulsory two years in the Israeli army, where I first
trained as a platoon commander and later worked as a draftsperson in the
army's central headquarters in Tel Aviv. I finished with the rank of
Staff Sergeant. My army experience has turned me into a pacifist.']

AVIGAIL ABARBANEL, PEACE PALESTINE - Two months ago I returned from a
two-week family visit to Israel. Although I am an activist for
Palestinian rights, I decided that this visit would be entirely private.
Living for two weeks with my brother, his wife and their two little
girls in their tiny apartment in a North Tel-Aviv suburb, gave me an
opportunity to observe and see what daily life is like for Israelis at
the moment.

I went for long walks in the streets of Tel-Aviv and visited many of the
places that I knew from my past. I shopped at the local supermaket and
had coffee at the nearby shopping mall. I watched local TV and even went
to the gym. . . Rather than talk, I did a lot of listening. I speak
fluent Hebrew, of course, so it was easy to blend in and people spoke
freely around me. Australian media likes to emphasize how hard life is
for Israelis, and I wanted to see for myself.

The most obvious thing about Israeli society is how profoundly insecure
Israelis feel. They are nervous and twitchy and live with extremely high
levels of anxiety. Not that any of this was new to me but there did seem
to be a new edge to it. When a bomb exploded in the Ha?carmel Market in
central Tel-Aviv, I was at the gym. I looked around me and within
moments everyone was on their mobile phones reporting to, or checking on
their loved ones. A young woman right next to me in the weights area
sighed to herself with anguish, ?not again?.

Since my adolescence, I was used to having my bags checked whenever I
entered a public building like a cinema or a supermarket anywhere in
Israel. Despite my 13 years in Australia, the reflex to open my bags was
still there. What was different this time was that now security guards
also have an electronic detector to scan your body. These days even
small businesses like restaurants and coffee shops have their own
security guard up the front. There is a small ?security levy? of 2 NIS
added onto your bill to help the business pay for the security guard,
but you aren't required to pay it.

Israelis have always talked about peace, sung about it, made art and
poetry about it as if it is something almost supernatural, some kind of
a paradise that they yearn for but that has nothing to do with their
everyday reality, and that they have no idea how to create. But what
peace really means to these exhausted, anxious Israelis is to be left
alone. It was sad and disturbing to see how desperately Israelis hold on
to what they believe is ?normality?. They are desperate to be ?like
everyone else? in any other Western country, go to work, go shopping, go
out to bars and coffee shops with friends. They feel outrage and
desperation when Palestinian militants occasionally disrupt this routine
of ?normality?. To some degree I can sympathize with that. After all
one of the main reasons I left Israel was that I found this way of life
unbearable.

When life is so difficult I suppose it is human to wish your
difficulties away. But here is where the problem really lies. When an
individual, a group or an entire society live with a dark secret or are
in denial about something important in their past, they cannot
experience peace. It is simply impossible to live a ?normal? or
peaceful life on a foundation of lies and secrecy. Denying the ethnic
cleansing of the Palestinians in 1948, trying to not think about the
consequences of long years of brutal occupation, and just wishing for it
all to go away is no more than a fantasy.

In family therapy there is an accepted principle that unless serious
injustices are addressed, there cannot be real peace. Families that
protect dark secrets always pay a heavy price. I watched Israeli
intellectuals on TV engage in genuine discussion trying to analyze and
understand why things are so bad in Israel. They raised every possible
reason for the situation other than the most obvious one Israel?s
history. It was excruciating to watch but also familiar. I have never
seen a society so steeped in denial as Israeli society. . .

When Israelis engage in ?peace talks? it is important to understand
their basic position. They have no real interest in a solution that goes
to the core of their problem. They are like an individual who wants his
or her symptoms to go away but refuses to do anything about their real
causes. A wish ?to be left alone? is not much of a basis for a
sustainable peace, at least not without another act of ethnic cleansing.
Six million Palestinians are there to remind Israel of its past, and
they are not going anywhere.

If a day comes, and I hope it does, when Israelis decide to stop living
in denial, they will have to realize that real peace will only come
through justice. Justice in this context means one thing, that the ideal
of an exclusively Jewish state at the cost of an entire people might
have to be abandoned. Only a bi-national state and a right of return for
the Palestinian refugees will come close enough to rectifying some of
the injustices committed in 1948 and since. Having been ethnically
cleansed, this is also what the Palestinians are entitled to under
international law and common human decency.

This could be Israel?s atonement. It will also be Israel?s opportunity
to free itself from carrying this burden of guilt that I believe is
making their lives and the lives of the Palestinians a nightmare. Yes,
it will be a challenge. But it will offer a possibility of real and
sustainable peace both for Israelis and for Palestinians, possibly for
the entire region. Continuing with the mentality and policy of denial
will lead nowhere, and will continue to cost the lives and wellbeing of
many more people and communities.

avigail.customer.netspace.net.au