Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (263703)	12/7/2005 4:15:31 PM
From: combjelly	Respond to of 1573730

"is this the rule he broke before the rule took effect?" No. What you are talking about is the charge that got thrown out. And Earle was right, there is no reason to believe that the conspiracy laws didn't apply to the election code. But, some politicians were making the claim that it didn't, which is why the law was clarified later. No,money laundering has always been illegal. Apparently DeLay's defense on that is centered on the fact the law didn't specifically mention checks. In other words, the exact meaning of the word "is"...