Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (177435)	12/8/2005 2:18:36 AM
From: stockman_scott	Respond to of 281500

The Iraqi Oil Crisis globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com ISN is reporting an Iraqi oil industry in crisis. Iraqi oil exports fell to their lowest level in two years in November 2005. Bad management of the reconstruction effort, widespread corruption among government figures, and sabotage by insurgents are the reasons for the decline. Experts say that the US strategy of military intervention in oil-rich regions can only diminish, rather than increase, the supply to world markets. Two-and-a-half years after the US invasion of Iraq, the country's oil industry is still in disarray. An official of the Oil Ministry in Baghdad told ISN Security Watch, on condition of anonymity: "We do not know the exact quantity of oil we are exporting, we do not exactly know the prices we are selling it for, and we do not know where the oil revenue is going to." One of the reasons for the decline of the industry is a lack of progress in the reconstruction effort, due to serious managerial deficiencies. For instance Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg Brown & Root (KBR) was awarded a US$225 million contract, without a tender, to rehabilitate the Qarmat Ali Water Plant in southern Iraq, according to a report in the Los Angeles Times. The plant is used to pump water into the ground in order to build pressure that brings the oil to the surface. However, the contract did not include the repair of the pipelines carrying the water to the oilfields. When the water was pumped into the ground, the old pipes burst, spilling large amounts of water into the desert. In addition, farmers often tap the water pipes in order to irrigate their fields. A failing strategy Oil terrorism and corruption, if allowed to continue, will seriously harm Iraq's future. The country's economy, damaged by two Gulf wars, the 2003 invasion and 13 years of UN sanctions, urgently needs a period of peaceful reconstruction and the exploration of new oilfields. Only 15 of over 70 known fields have been developed properly. It usually takes at least five years to bring a new field into operation. Michael T. Klare, a Professor of Peace and World Security at Hampshire College and author of the book 'Blood and Oil', wrote that it is "an article of faith among America's senior policymakers – Democrats and Republicans alike – that military force is an effective tool for ensuring control over foreign sources of oil." However, Klare concludes that "the growing Iraqi quagmire has demonstrated that the application of military force can have the very opposite effect; it can diminish – rather than enhance – America's access to foreign oil." One of the myths of this war was that oil revenue would quickly pay for reconstruction of Iraq. Instead it has reduced the flow of oil, uncovered zero WOMDs, and led to a civil war between various Iraqi factions. The US is of course caught in the middle. Let's consider the bright side. Some might consider this a win-win-win situation. * Mobil is making record profits * The S&P energy sectors have been on fire most of the year * Halliburton execs get to pad their pockets with "free" taxpayer money Now if you are in a group that benefited from those developments, our strategy in Iraq might be considered a complete success. On the other hand, if you are in the much larger group more concerned about prices of gas at the pump as opposed to the government stuffing your wallet with lucrative contracts to water the desert, perhaps you see things differently. Mike Shedlock / Mish

To: Bilow who wrote (177435)	12/8/2005 1:16:09 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

The disrespect is on your side just as much, if not more, than on mine. You're using the tragic death of a soldier as ammunition in the political battle over whether or not we should be in the war. Actually, I'm not.. Most of the soldiers I know understand why we're here. They may not be happy to be away from their families for 12-15 months doing it, or some may be expressing contempt for those Iraqis who seem to be putting their own selfish interests in front of the Iraqi national interest, but almost every one of them will say that the kids are those we need to save.. The Adults have to pacified/neutralized so because their already indoctrinated into their lifestyle of hatred and corruption. The whole premise behind the war is that if we fight it long enough, we will win. No.. the whole premise of the war is that we're counting on the instinctive human nature to want a say in their how they are governed, and facilitating a lasting political structure that provides people a forum to peacefully resolve their differences. To create a sense that this government will be accountable and not temporary, but a lasting institution that will overcome the current "robber mentality" that dictates "steal what you can now because you'll never have another opportunity like this". We saw this in Russia as well and it required almost a decade to neutralize (or at least stabilize). The one difference between this war and Vietnam, is that we're applying the doctrine of "Vietnamization" of the war early on, rather than trying to do it all for the Iraqis. We're holding them accountable to maintain security and order. It may not be successful in the end, but if they aren't willing to fight for their Iraqi nation/state, then why should we? Hawk