Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (126834)	12/8/2005 1:56:38 PM
From: Galirayo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

So are You Looking for a Pull Back ?? <g> Sounds like the Bear will get some Happy Campers. lol Message 21952116

To: Henry J Costanzo who wrote (126834)	12/8/2005 2:04:01 PM
From: Win-Lose-Draw	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

This makes zero sense... To get more advantageous rollover prices, they do their best to knock down those markets ahead of the transfer date. If anything, those with large positions needing rollover want smooth sailing so the rollover can happen in predictable fashion. Futures are classic definition of a zero-sum game. This doesn't make sense either... There are way too many bulls in the system as triple-witching kicks into gear. Futures are not stocks. For every futures contract, longs are matched 1:1 with shorts.