Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Shack who wrote (126858)	12/8/2005 8:40:18 PM
From: skinowski	Respond to of 209892

Buy the gap down.-vbg I'm wondering about the same thing. May turn out to be a decent low risk play.

To: Shack who wrote (126858)	12/8/2005 8:50:58 PM
From: Galirayo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

Shack .. Ski .. Ok .. may I ask ?? What Gap Down ? On the SOX ? If it Gaps down it's headed to at least 477. Right? If not then 465? Split it near the middle to 470. Message 21955617 But it may go Lower.

To: Shack who wrote (126858)	12/8/2005 9:43:24 PM
From: Henry J Costanzo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 209892

<<Buy the gap down.>>...(assume you're talking SOX).......IN EDIT...AND assuming there will be a gap down manana....g Nope..sorry, can't do that, Shack. In the first place, violates my standard MO......never anticipate...and boy, that would anticipate in a big way . Secondly, I'm following the scenario of a guru who's looking ing for SOX 467 as the area where a turn around might come into play.....and think I'll stick with him...... oh........btw....you might have seen him...calls himself MC something-or-other.....LOL In EDIT......Italics last two paras volunteered by SI.........I didn't type them that way, and no way I could get rid of italics without deleting and starting all over..gg