Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (264378)	12/12/2005 8:41:52 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1587791

What do you think?" That's more like it. I still think a lot more thought should go into it. I think some zoning ordinances should be created so that we can't use federal money foolishly. I would oppose federal money being spent to construct prefab communities or trailer parks, just so to move everyone back in. I would also like to see some discussion on alternatives. You are saying the alternatives are not viable and you may be right. I would like to hear the other sides of that argument before just agreeing to go along with you. Good. I was starting to worry. I have no problem with a discussion of alternatives. In fact, at first, I thought much like you. However, in looking into the matter, I learned that there is considerable economic value to NO besides the significant social importance of the city. BTW that social importance is nearly as valuable as the economic. We are not a nation of great cities.....we have 5 or 6 and that's it. We don't need to lose NO if for no other reason that its a valuable tourist destination for Americans and non Americans alike.