Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Gordon Hodgson who wrote (182892)	12/13/2005 4:34:45 AM
From: Amy J	Respond to of 186894

RE: "A fitting end for amd would be for Intel to hurry up and CRUSH the life out" I'm beginning to agree, purely because IP theft is much too pervasive in some countries. But I also think Intel needs to go through the alphabet, starting with A first, then moving on to B, and so on, and aggressively crush any American firm that whores itself to firms simply wanting to steal IP out from under their own foolish noses. If Congress wants to enforce global IP protection, then there's no need to crush anyone because it would be a fair competitive playing field. But since Congress doesn't want to enforce global IP protection, then the only way to handle such sophisticated global IP theft is to start crushing companies that put themselves at risk of IP theft. For example, Cisco never should have allowed 3Com to survive, dangling for life. You have to kill, crush and stomp your competitor completely lifeless in today's global world, where IP theft is pervasive. If Congress thinks crushing the competitor is wrong, then they need to consider enforcing IP global protection since IP theft is wrong - it is stealing Regards, Amy J