Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the-phoenix who wrote (126969)	12/13/2005 8:12:18 AM
From: skinowski	Respond to of 209892

ii of C would have gone somewhat higher than the top of the B. Right now, I do not recall reading anything which would not alow that - and from my own observations, I've seen it "work" However - Very often at turning points indexes (which don't have the same relative strength) end up tracing out NOT the same structures. The range since Nov 23 in SPX is certainly not an ABC with a wedge at the end -- more like a double zigzag. So what? Imagine that the SPX double zigzag is made of rubber, and pull it down carefully by its lowest tip near the end.... and what you'll see, will begin to look like a wedge!... -g. They're all "made" of the same action. Great work, Shack. Looks very convincing... this will quite likely turn out to be the key to the "conundrum" of the last few weeks.