Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Aragorn1968 who wrote (3136)	12/13/2005 10:05:42 AM
From: mimur	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78426

maybe SS would be more effective...they have veys of making you talk

To: Aragorn1968 who wrote (3136)	12/13/2005 10:56:52 AM
From: ralfph	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78426

Aragorn- you are in a learning curve. High risk means just that. The odds are about 179 to 1 that any given company will hit something worthy of further drilling. What you got screwed around on was the leakage and what I see as poor management practices. The stock price would have dropped anyway but it would have been nice not to get screwed around with. TK- ? There ain,t no run up . These guys will drill their holes and walk away if the results are poor. There will not be any leakage even if they hit . The thing with TK is that they have more property in their stable and are looking for more. It is an early stage company. I will not lose a cent with TK- because I am willing to ride it for a few years if need be. So wait for the results. If they are poor I will buy in after the panic selling. If they are good I will load up. Its about management , burn rate , property. Look at management first . ralfph thats it I am gone