Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (150941)	12/14/2005 11:01:28 AM
From: aladin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793838

Tom, C2: Everything about the reporting on Katrina was wrong. Why do you both assume deficiencies with regard to the COE? Its a smear, just like everything else in NO. To wit: newsobserver.com Published: Dec 14, 2005 12:30 AM Modified: Dec 14, 2005 07:54 AM Levee pilings met standards Engineers remove sections of sheet wall for testing near the 17th Street Canal levee in New Orleans, as part of an investigation into why the levee failed during Hurricane Katrina. AP Photo by Chitose Suzuki Brett Martel, The Associated Press Eight sections of steel sheet pulled Tuesday from a failed New Orleans levee appear to have been driven into the ground to the specified depth, contradicting earlier tests, engineers said. The sheet pilings were removed as part of an investigation into why the flood wall at the 17th Street Canal failed, contributing to floods that covered 80 percent of the city when Hurricane Katrina struck Aug. 29. The steel had been sunk into the ground to prevent water from saturating the soil and destabilizing the flood walls. Initial testing by sonar had indicated the sheet pilings were driven to only about 10 feet below sea level. The design called for 17 1/2 feet below sea level. The discrepancy fueled suspicion of wrongdoing in the building of the flood wall, attracting criminal investigators to the work site. The U.S. attorney, state attorney general and district attorney all have begun investigations into the building and maintenance of the levees.After pulling and measuring the pilings, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers officials expressed a measure of relief as the Corps was responsible for ensuring that the construction matched the design when the flood wall was built in the early 1990s. If the wall was built to specifications, the next question will be whether the design was faulty. "We need to look at all the failure mechanisms because obviously something did happen here, and each piece of the puzzle helps us determine what happened," said Col. Lewis Setliff, commander of the task force restoring about 350 miles of hurricane protection levees in the New Orleans area. Brig. Gen. Robert Crear said the length of the sections pulled all exceeded 23 feet. About 6 feet of the sheet piling was above sea level, leaving a little more than 17 feet below sea level -- in accordance with design specifications. Engineers also plan to test the concrete and the reinforcing bars in the wall to ensure they were made properly. Also, engineers must try to figure out why the sonar tests yielded bad results on how deep the sheet pilings were driven. All rights reserved. This copyrighted material may not be published, broadcast or redistributed in any manner. Copyright 2005, The News & Observer Publishing Company A subsidiary of The McClatchy Company