SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : PHGI -Perihelion Global, Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: rrufff who wrote (405)12/17/2005 12:56:33 PM
From: gatekeeper777  Respond to of 827
 
I would tend to think that it would make more sense to get the stock price up and spread the wealth to increase the companies worth. rather then making shareholders mad with r/s and dilution and a few good Pr's. How many companies does this guy need to ruin before he and his greedy family take a hint that you can only milk the shareholders for so long before the fat cow goes dry.With 4 million shares in my portfolio of VWKM i wont buy even 1/2 share more until I see improvement.Thhis is one eskimo thats not buying anymore ice cubes this winter.He needs to retire shares and NOT buy them back for later possible dulution. Does this man have bricks for brains? Glad its winter cuz i am NOT paying for his families swimming pool or BBQ grill.
If this stock isnt up by 4/1/06 he can have my shares back even at a loss to me as the Angstrom name in the stock market would be considered akin to the Hanta virus.



To: rrufff who wrote (405)12/17/2005 1:00:51 PM
From: donpat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 827
 
Sounds good to me - and as he has SAID he will buy back UP TO etc. I expect him to do so SIGNIFICANTLY. Now, if he has confidence in the potential, as I do, and I'm sure (!) he does, we should see the results fairly quickly. It sure would help with some signed cable/FO/satellite deals being inked. Snow ball rolling time!

I like the prospects.



To: rrufff who wrote (405)12/17/2005 4:42:14 PM
From: creede  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 827
 
"(obviously a WAG on my part.)"

What's a WAG? TIA

GB+ND
c