Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dale Baker who wrote (7190)	12/17/2005 12:39:38 PM
From: michael97123	Respond to of 541340

"Like I said, if people want to change the Constitution, then amend it to fit the modern age. Until then, people who swear to uphold and defend it can't claim they are "unduly" bound by its provisions" Are you an originalist when it comes to SCOTUS matters? You must be for Alito then. I think your above quote sounds suspiciously like something Scalia wrote. (g)

To: Dale Baker who wrote (7190)	12/17/2005 2:33:21 PM
From: MrLucky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541340

...people who swear to uphold and defend it can't claim they are "unduly" bound by its provisions. Does this mean that you disagree with the US Supreme Court decision in Kelo v City of New London, saying that it is okay to take privately owned property for "private use"? The point of this question is to determine whether you believe that both the President of the US and the Supreme Court are bound by the US Constitution since they both have sworn to uphold it.