SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KLP who wrote (151584)12/17/2005 11:04:45 PM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793559
 
Sure, other countries will throw their weight in the right direction, just as they did against the Taleban and Osama. For example, Japan won't want China taking over Taiwan by brute force. Neither will South Korea. Nor Australia. Nor a lot of others. The USA won't want to have Taiwan just gobbled up.

The Europeans are unlikely to care, though Britain is likely to see it as a retrograde step.

It wouldn't worry me if the USA was isolationist. I don't think they'll do that though. They have too much fun zooming around the world as Team America, fighting evil-doers.

<Maybe some think that if the US gets nuked, it won't affect them. I would suggest those that think that, might re-think that idea. They and their country will be toast as well.>

How's that? Suppose Saddam did have a nuke, and managed to get it into Noo Yawk in a container full of opium as a decoy to the customs officers on the take. Say Noo Yawk got blown up. Why would that mean every other country on Earth would also be toast? I can't see how that would benefit the average, or any, American. Okay, there would be some Americans who would benefit, but not many.

Suppose they turned the whole of the middle east into sand, they could then occupy it and help themselves to the oil, which would be profitable for those involved. But it wouldn't result in cheaper oil to the garden-variety SUV driver.

Mqurice