Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Vosilla who wrote (43035)	12/19/2005 1:22:42 PM
From: redfish	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

Getting asploded by terrorists is a silly thing to fear ... tin foil hat territory.

To: John Vosilla who wrote (43035)	12/19/2005 1:33:35 PM
From: LLCF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

Not to down play the possible seriousness of domestic spying... but Congress is all over this stuff. The idea that we're headed for some kind of police state is just silly IMHO. What was going on under LBJ makes this look like we've made real progress on the issue. DAK

To: John Vosilla who wrote (43035)	12/19/2005 4:31:56 PM
From: Tommaso	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 116555

>>>what the other side did to Clinton<<, Mainly what the other side did was to prove that Clinton had what many people would call sex with a young woman, although he said that he didn't. I know that for many people, especially for Republicans, Clinton's having sex with Monica was a no-no. And the Republicans sure did a good job proving that this no-no really happened. Not much was left for the imagination to fill in, though no doubt the investigators wished that there had been video tapes made inside the White House, much as Nixon had those audio tapes. From the point of view of Kenneth Starr, it was a terrible shame that it was Monica and not Paris Hilton who was interning.

To: John Vosilla who wrote (43035)	12/19/2005 5:43:37 PM
From: NOW	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 116555

John, i take it you mean that you think the constitution is an matters sometimes and not others? and that violating it will make us all safer? I am puzzled that you find the threat of terrorism to be as great as that...say, by the way, what ever became of the anthrax scare John?