Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (7567)	12/19/2005 11:10:51 PM
From: MrLucky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541922

Risk from terrorists, risk from snooping, same difference--low probability Not sure how you equate terrorist risk versus snooping risk. The former makes you quite dead. Your camera is considerably different from mine. We have been hit over and over by AQ and the muslim terrorists. How many years? Since 1972, I think. It is clear to me that they will continue until we (the USA) stop them. No other country is yet convinced or prepared to do so. These countries will get religion (no pun) as the attacks continue through out the world. BTW, I don't go to sleep each worrying about the next attack. My family knows what to do and when to do it.

To: Lane3 who wrote (7567)	12/20/2005 4:37:35 AM
From: KLP	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 541922

They have had more than one "lucky shot", karen. Remember the WTCI bombing...1993....Seems to me that people got killed in that blast, many got wounded, business'es were hurt, the buildings were very damaged....and billions spent again looking for these people. en.wikipedia.org Plus of course, all the other bombings on our sovereign territory in the Embassies, and Military buildings, and ships...etc. More than one "lucky shot" for sure.