Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lane3 who wrote (7670)	12/20/2005 3:00:17 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 543153

It is a one-to-one metric. There is no threat when the commitment of both or various parties is to the common good, as I've positioned it. A conscious threat to one party is only validated by the intentional ill regard by one or more of the other parties, which is backed by the threat of or actual perpetration of harmful conduct. So when one party positions itself as a threat to another party an assessment for the risk of harm should be considered, until or unless a return to commitment for the mutual common good can be established. Although self defense is advisable, when commitment to the common good has broken down, no amount of well honed sabers will repair it in the long run. Automobile crashes do not seem to me to fall under the same umbrella.