SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : A Neutral Corner -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (1736)12/21/2005 1:36:21 PM
From: D. Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 2253
 
It is allowed for physicists and astronomers to belief such without being condemned as non-scientific

No physicist or astronomer is hypothesizing and publishing their religious beliefs as scientific fact. The same controversy would exist in those fields as biology if they tried. It's not science. You can believe whatever you want, but not all beliefs are amenable to scientific investigation. I don't understand what's so hard about this.

Derek



To: Brumar89 who wrote (1736)12/21/2005 2:55:11 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 2253
 
Is it state supported religious indoctrination for students to be taught that science says no god had anything to do with us or the universe being here?

Is someone teaching that? If so, I missed it.

Evolution is compatible with belief that God created the universe. It doesn't affirm or negate that belief. Suggesting that it does is misunderstanding or an over-reaction.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News