Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Srexley who wrote (719260)	12/21/2005 3:46:13 PM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Cutting and pasting words out of order, and out of context... and not including the direct LINKS to the originals which would allow your lying to be investigated are hardly tactics likely to earn you any respect. The more you resort to lying like that the less anyone is going to bother listening to your words.... LAST OPPORTUNITY: If you have a charge to make against me (you think I 'lied', came to a false or unwarranted conclusion, whatever...), then simply link to my words that you find objectionable, state your case, and I will try to politely respond to your argument. FAILING THAT MINIMAL LEVEL OF HONESTY, THOUGH... if you are going to continue with the tactics you have been employing thus far: blatant lies, putting words in my mouth that I never uttered, mis-remembering or fantasizing my comments, deliberately mis-quoting my comments (while leaving out the LINKS that would clearly establish your lying), then I'll be content to leave you flapping your gums all alone... because your childish lies are not worthy of further responses. --------------------------------------------- REGARDING YOUR TRANSPARENTLY FALSE CHARGES (to which you conveniently REMOVED ALL THE LINKS, and altered the quotes, to try to make it LOOK like you had a case, and were not lying. :( "I believe you actually said you didn't miss any factors...." srexley 12-16-05" (This one is hilarious! As I've pointed out to you over and over: my ORIGINAL POST didn't list ANY 'factors' at ALL... so it would be ridiculous to say --- and I certainly NEVER DID SAY --- that I'd 'not missed any factors'! LOL!!!!! This one is ENTIRELY a fantasy made-up in YOUR HEAD. It NEVER HAPPENED here in the real world. Then, here is where you LIE by falsely truncating my reply to make it appear that I had said something which, in fact, I HAD NOT. You posted THIS LIE, Scott:"I didn't 'dismiss' any factors, Scott..." buddy 12-15-05 --- after carefully removing the link so your manipulation would not be so easy to expose. My FULL REPLY answered that "I didn't 'dismiss' any factors, Scott... just pointed out the statistics." [Notice the quotes around the word that you introduced? That means that I am not claiming it]. I, of course, replied SEVERAL MORE TIMES trying to clear up your apparent confusion... pointing out over-and-over again that I had NEVER claimed to have posted an 'analysis', never claimed to have analysized 'all' factors, or even ANY 'factors' which might have produced or caused the single fact contained in my short, two sentence post: that the current economic recovery (from the last recession) was below the average strength (thus far) for the average post-WW II recovery. siliconinvestor.com But, of course, your confusion and subsequent lying only multiplied: Message 21980819 Message 21980789 See this post where I specifically (and politely) answered your question the FIRST time you asked it: Message 21980420 Here are links to your specific earlier lies: Message 21976741 And my reply to them, calling you on them: Message 21976979 And, HERE IS WHERE YOU ADMIT THAT ONE OF YOUR STATEMENTS WAS FALSE (WHILE CONTINUING TO CLAIM THE OTHER ONE WASN'T): Message 21977070 And, my reply: Message 21977085