Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ms.smartest.person who wrote (3409)	12/21/2005 7:04:58 PM
From: hubris33	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78411

Merryfield, I started with the list on the Resource Investor article that I posted and then found a map. The article author cautioned about 'bullchip' investing noting that McEwen likes a certain kind of play. So far the best of the bunch have been snapped up. The only one that remains a mystery is MAD.v but that has apparently been under quiet accumulation. Perhaps the BOD turned down RM's overtures and he is buying his stake the old fashioned way, through the market. One other that I would have expected to be a target has dropped like a rock of recent, BVG.v I have thought about a few others, namely those with unprofitable mining operations, where the GG magic could be applied, but today's announcement of a buy in of Minera suggests that quality plays are of paramount importance. Do not short change yourself on the way you got into the play/trade. A win is a win. Now the question I am wondering about is this: How does Rob McEwen combine all of these little companies into one Medium/Big company? I think I saw somewhere that he hates debt so borrowing may not be an option, so the other solution would be a share swap. Now I also thought I remember a comment about a commitment to shareowners and not continually diluting their position. Thoughts? History? H3