Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (152247)	12/22/2005 7:53:26 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 793955

That's arrogance of modernity. So, because people once thought that stirring in eye of newt and toe of frog was scientific we need to teach it in science class? I suppose, then, we should also teach what was once considered medicine in medical school... Science classes teach a lot of things which are still theories under development Of course they do. But they are scientific theories, not philosophic theories or political theories or any other kind of theories. And they will be replaced with better scientific theories at such time as any are developed. But you don't replace a scientific theory with a philosophical theory. Not in science class.