Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Taro who wrote (265668)	12/22/2005 3:54:35 PM
From: American Spirit	Respond to of 1573682

Wrong. Iran was moderating significantly in 1999-2001. There could have been a real breakthrough there. But then came Bush's "Axis Of Evil" speech, his blundering occupation of Iraq, Abu Graiab and a new Iranian election. Guess who won? The most anti-American candidates only, of course. So Bush is responsible for that. Just as he is responsible for whomever wins in Iraq, which looks like Islamic mullahs. Also, Bush made North Korea more dangerous by disengaging with them at the same time he threatened them. Both NK and Iran may have nukes now because of Bush's threats and lack of diplomacy. So tell me honestly, is this what Bush had in mind when he made his Acis Of Evil speech? To turn all three places into more dangerous places? Something to consider next time you get the urge to praise Bush for being a great commander in chief. But gee, at least we don't have that "traitor" Kerry in charge, huh? He's really "weak on defence". As if.