SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D. Long who wrote (152359)12/22/2005 6:00:56 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 794006
 
And ID is not science because it expressly rejects the underlying principles of science - naturalism, empiricism, and testability.

Not at all. We just have to find creative ways to investigate and test it.

After all, how do you test the theory of the big bang? Repeat the experiment and create a new universe?



To: D. Long who wrote (152359)12/22/2005 7:46:20 PM
From: Thomas A Watson  Respond to of 794006
 
ID rejects no underlying principles of science. Every underlying principles of science is observable and testable because the intelligent designer wanted it that way. As an engineer with all my experience with science I find ID is totally consistant with all commonly understood to mean the method of scientists.

I have no idea why religious like zealots beliefs refuses to see that.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News