SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : John Kerrys Crimes & Lies -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cage Rattler who wrote (1880)12/24/2005 4:10:12 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 1905
 
Did the American Press Side with the Nazis?
Written by John Armor
Saturday, December 24, 2005
chronwatch.com

The American press did not side with the Nazis in World War II and afterwards. But parts of them are siding now with the Ba’athists in the Iraqi War. Witness this lead from the Lexington Herald-Leader, online version, today (Friday):

An Iraqi court has ruled that some of the most prominent Sunni Muslims who were elected to parliament last week won't be allowed to serve because officials suspect that they were high-ranking members of Saddam Hussein's Baath Party.

Knight Ridder has obtained a copy of the court ruling, which has yet to be circulated to the public.

The ruling is likely to dampen Bush administration hopes that the election would bring more of the disaffected Sunni minority into Iraq's political process and undermine Sunni support for the insurgency. Instead, the decision is likely to stoke fears of widening sectarian divisions in a nation already in danger of descending into civil war.

Source: kentucky.com

Substitute "Nazi" for "Ba'athist" and 1945 for 2005 and "Germany" for "Iraq." The rest of this article would stand as written. After all, preventing Nazis from participating in German elections between 1945 and 1949 (when the first national German elections were held) certainly contributed to "disaffection" and "sectarian divisions."

The difference is that no American newspaper after World War II would have considered for a minute attacking anyone for excluding Nazis from the election lists in Germany at that time. So what are the differences, then to now?

Did the Ba'athists not murder men, women, and children? Did the Ba’athists not conduct wars against their neighbors? Did the Ba'athists not lie, cheat, and steal? Were the Ba'athists not blood-thirsty dictators?

No, the difference then to now is that some elements of the American press are looking for any opportunities to embarrass and hobble the Bush administration in the aftermath of this war. Very few of the American media were wont to do that against the Truman administration in the aftermath of World War II. There was, of course, the legendary feature article in Life Magazine by John Dos Passos, saying that America was “losing the peace” in Germany, published about a year before the democratic government in Germany was elected under Konrad Adenaur, during the Allies’ occupation of West Germany.

For those who do not know about him, Adenaur was one of the few elected officials in Germany at the time who was not a former Nazi and who had not been assassinated by the werewolves who were active in Germany for two years after the German surrender. Adenaur had previously been a mayor.

To those unfamiliar with it, the “deNazification” effort post World War II was very similar to the “deBa’athification” program in Iraq today. There is one glaring exception. No major American media (or politicians) were rooting for the Nazis, then.

Once again, failure of the American press to crack a history book infects its reporting, and reveals its anti-American bias in derogation of that history.

This article originally appeared on Newsbusters.com



To: Cage Rattler who wrote (1880)12/24/2005 11:12:25 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 1905
 
'Twas the night before Christmas at the ACLU

'Twas the night before Christmas, at the ACLU,
Twelve lawyers were sitting with nothing to do;
Their court briefs were piled on the table with care,
In hopes they could find a judge still working somewhere.

The plaintiffs were busy rehearsing their lines,
With visions of jury awards filling their minds;
And Heather in her Halston and Leo in his Armani,
Were working the phones like Patton’s 3rd Army.

When out in the lobby arose such a clatter,
I sprang from my desk to see what was the matter.
Away to the door I flew like a jet,
Ran right down the hall and worked up a sweat!

The lamp in the corner threw off a great glow,
Reflected in the Corsican tiles below;
When, what to my wondering eyes should appear,
But a liberal judge, and eight clerks at his rear.

With a flick of a finger, so lively and brisk,
He drew out a gavel and pounded the desk.
More rapid than eagles his coursers they came,
And he whistled, and shouted, and called them by name.

"Now, Roscoe! now, Morton! now Ashley and Vixen!
On, Kwame! on Harvey! on, Sheryl and Dixon!
To the conference room table! Take the case that you choose!
It’s just hours ‘fore Christmas! Not a moment to lose!

As dry leaves that before the wild hurricane fly,
When they meet with an order, they never ask why.
So atop the big table their briefcases flew,
And they beckoned for help from the ACLU.

And then, in a twinkling, the laser printer did clatter,
And his clerks and my lawyers engaged in loud chatter;
As I drew in my head, and was looking around,
Down the hall came the judge – he had put on his gown.

He was dressed all in black, from his head to his foot,
And he wore on his face a most sinister look.
The gavel he’d rattled now twirled in his hand,
And he looked at the ready to quiet this band.

His eyes were like coal, his mouth in a frown!
His cheeks were all hollow, his nose twisted down!
He smirked as he shouted, “Get moving! Let’s Go!
There’s a Christmas to ruin – get on with the show!”

His stump of a pipe emitted a cloud,
And the smoke it encircled his head like a shroud.
He had a thin face and big ears like Perot,
That wiggled, when he spoke, just a very odd show.

He read all the briefs, as we sat and looked on,
And we feared that our chance to halt Christmas had gone.
But a wink of his eye and a twist of his head,
Soon gave me to know I had nothing to dread.

He drew out his pen and went straight to his work,
And filed all the orders with his army of clerks.
Then pounding his gavel he shouted his dictum,
”Christmas is banned, for all time, ad infinitum!”

He sprang to his feet, and his clerks followed suit,
And away they all flew like a horse through a chute;
But I heard him exclaim, ere his tires gave a squeal,
"No more Christmas for all, lest you lose on appeal!"



To: Cage Rattler who wrote (1880)12/25/2005 9:23:41 PM
From: paret  Respond to of 1905
 
gircweb.org



To: Cage Rattler who wrote (1880)12/25/2005 9:29:26 PM
From: paret  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1905
 
gircweb.org