Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pompsander who wrote (719761)	12/26/2005 5:43:19 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769670

Ken speaks in relative terms, but has finite values. In the past he has called me many things. He is simply colorful. His gruff exterior is in intentional opposition to those that would offer their posterior to an enemy rather than stand. He also takes great offense and rightly so to those who would attempt to argue a nonexistent moral relativity for animal terrorists that kill women and children intentionally and our forces. It sickens him that many people argue against Bush and the war on terror because Bush is in charge only. I understand Ken to a great degree and he isn't giving an inch to those that would bend over and give up our way of life to animals for a false promise of peace. Self destructive people need to kill themselves if that is their choice and not take the rest of the free world with them. It isn't a clever argument, it isn't a fascinating game or a sport; it is real war and he has chosen his ground. I would certainly stand with Ken before standing hopelessly with the rump rangers on this thread.

To: pompsander who wrote (719761)	12/26/2005 11:02:22 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Once again, now, for you retards: Everyone who disagrees with CYBERKEN is not necessarily ANYTHING that must be labeled. You completely miss the point (being a moron, that's expected of you.) PRO-AMERICANS who present ARGUMENTS get DISCOURSE (and I wish everyone here was full-fledged human and pro-American-but many are NOT.) ANTI-AMERICANS (i.e., America's ENEMIES; you'll need a dictionary here.) deserve NO discourse and are described by CYBERKEN for what they are. In fact, CYBERKEN is usually TOO GENEROUS, even FLATTERING, in describing the subhuman enemies of America. If you don't remember a day when DISCOURSE took place between PATRIOTS with differing opinions, LOG OFF and read a f--king BOOK...