Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gold and Silver Juniors, Mid-tiers and Producers -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (3622)	12/27/2005 9:07:01 PM
From: roguedolphin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78412

OT: Ralph.....I notice you're somewhat politically opinionated. There's a board over on IHUB that I partake in and would like you to check it out. I think you may enjoy some of my posts. investorshub.com Rogue

To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (3622)	12/27/2005 9:51:31 PM
From: jackjc	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 78412

RE, any bullishness EC has had was never about AUA. I cautioned about AUA enough times, and the offtake, but was circumspect as your moly thread was mainly about AUA and there was much hype by Alexander & Co early on. But my fav Roxmark is delayed and in the doghouse also, so no brag rights for me so far. And I am in ROK, UNB, and GPXM for small gambles, though all have yet to prove they can get their moly out and sell it. But I am holding my moly stocks and giving them 2006 to sort the whole thing out. Big gains are in the offing even at 20 moly IMO. Along with the silver and gold, copper and zinc, I have room for the moly, tantalum, and some other metals.

To: Proud Deplorable who wrote (3622)	12/28/2005 11:20:57 AM
From: ogi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 78412

Ralph, what can I say that I did not say about AUA and Gor's management a long time ago. You had to play it as a promotion designed to maximize benefits to management, not on fundamentals. Everything about them spoke to that, especially their approach to IR which was not the IR people's fault it was exactly what management wanted to get for their IR dollars. One look at Larry Reagh's insider trading reports and you knew you did not want to be in that company long term. Period end of story. Cheers, Ogi